Because these results provided support for the reliability and construct validity of the GQ-6-J, the measure is expected to contribute to research in the Japanese population as a suitable instrument to assess dispositional gratitude. As expected, the GQ-6-J scores were moderately correlated with scores on the measures of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the GQ-6-J is distinguishable from the measures of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. The second measure of quality in a quantita-tive study is. For example, a survey designed to explore depression but which actually measures anxiety would not be consid-ered valid. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on the GQ-6-J confirmed the same single factor structure as that of the original GQ-6. through measurement of the validity and reliability.1 Validity Validity is dened as the extent to which a concept is accurately measured in a quantitative study. 92 for the two administrations, respectively) and test–retest reliability (r =. This study examined the reliability and construct validity of the Japanese translation (GQ-6-J) of the Gratitude Questionnaire 6-item form (GQ-6) in a sample of 409 Japanese college students (166 women, 263 men mean age = 20.6 years, SD = 1.36), who completed the questionnaire on two occasions separated by four weeks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |